<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: RSS as a Syndication Platform</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.barbarafeldman.com/rss-as-a-syndication-platform/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.barbarafeldman.com/rss-as-a-syndication-platform/</link>
	<description>If my life had a tagline, it would go here.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 08:16:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Hurst</title>
		<link>http://www.barbarafeldman.com/rss-as-a-syndication-platform/comment-page-1/#comment-2079</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Hurst</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2003 23:49:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.barbarafeldman.com/blog/rss-as-a-syndication-platform/#comment-2079</guid>
		<description>We came up with a similar concept to this but from a different angle and I am interested in a comparison and people&#039;s comments.  I have NOT read the stuff on RSS but if I do not write this my mind will go blank on the subject!
MailAgent has built into it the ability to deliver personalised emails in a web browser.  What we did was to design a system to send subscribers a single mail with a link to the latest version of the newsletter.
All that happens is that centrally the link is repointed as new newsletters are created and hey-presto the &quot;Perpetual Newsletter&quot; is born.
Benfits:
- You still send emails and migrate people to Perpetual
- Personalisation is retained for tracking
- People only read when they want
- Stats are consolidated for all delivery mechanisms
Cons:
- No Pull technology (well it&#039;s in the lab)
- Notifcaition is needed for ad-hoc mailers
- Lose the Master mail and you have to ask again
This is a great new area and one which has a lot of potential.  We think combine the old and new - what do people think?
Regards
Robert Hurst
MD
MailAgent
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We came up with a similar concept to this but from a different angle and I am interested in a comparison and people&#8217;s comments.  I have NOT read the stuff on RSS but if I do not write this my mind will go blank on the subject!<br />
MailAgent has built into it the ability to deliver personalised emails in a web browser.  What we did was to design a system to send subscribers a single mail with a link to the latest version of the newsletter.<br />
All that happens is that centrally the link is repointed as new newsletters are created and hey-presto the &#8220;Perpetual Newsletter&#8221; is born.<br />
Benfits:<br />
- You still send emails and migrate people to Perpetual<br />
- Personalisation is retained for tracking<br />
- People only read when they want<br />
- Stats are consolidated for all delivery mechanisms<br />
Cons:<br />
- No Pull technology (well it&#8217;s in the lab)<br />
- Notifcaition is needed for ad-hoc mailers<br />
- Lose the Master mail and you have to ask again<br />
This is a great new area and one which has a lot of potential.  We think combine the old and new &#8211; what do people think?<br />
Regards<br />
Robert Hurst<br />
MD<br />
MailAgent</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 22/33 queries in 0.029 seconds using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via cdn.barbarafeldman.com

Served from: www.barbarafeldman.com @ 2012-02-08 12:56:20 -->
